Fractional counting of authorship to quantify scientific research output

نویسنده

  • Vincenzo Carbone
چکیده

We investigate the problem of counting co-authorhip in order to quantify the impact and relevance of scientific research output through normalized h-index and g-index. We use the papers whose authors belong to a subset of full professors of the Italian Settore Scientifico Disciplinare (SSD) FIS01 Experimental Physics. In this SSD two populations, characterized by the number of co-authors of each paper, are roughly present. The total number of citations for each individuals, as well as their h-index and g-index, strongly depends on the average number of co-authors. We show that, in order to remove the dependence of the various indices on the two populations, the best way to define a fractional counting of autorship is to divide the number of citations received by each paper by the square root of the number of co-authors. This allows us to obtain some information which can be used for a better understanding of the scientific knowledge made through the process of writing and publishing papers.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Counting and comparing publication output with and without equalizing and inflationary bias

This paper examines the effects of inflationary and equalizing bias on publication output rankings. Any identifiable amount of bias in authorship accreditation was detrimental to accuracy when ranking a select group of leading Canadian aquaculture researchers. Bias arose when publication scores were calculated without taking into account information about multiple authorship and differential co...

متن کامل

Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting

The analysis of bibliometric networks, such as co-authorship, bibliographic coupling, and co-citation networks, has received a considerable amount of attention. Much less attention has been paid to the construction of these networks. We point out that different approaches can be taken to construct a bibliometric network. Normally the full counting approach is used, but we propose an alternative...

متن کامل

Lotka’ s Law, Co-authorship and Interdisciplinary Publishing

The robustness or breakdown of Lotka’s law about the frequency distribution of scientific productivity depends on scientific cooperation, counting methods, interdisciplinary publishing and selection methods for sample collections. We have chosen to analyse the relationship using Mandelbrot’s equivalent distribution model because this model is sensitive and uses the original data (scores). Five ...

متن کامل

Mapping co-authorship network of Iranian researchers in the field of knowledge management

Background and aim: So far, many researches have been conducted on the co-authorship study of all authors of universities and organizations as one of the most important topics in the field of scientometrics in various fields and disciplines. The aim of this study was to map the co-authorship network of Iranian researchers in the field of knowledge management in Web of Science (WoS). Material a...

متن کامل

Kharazmi University Scientific Publications and Co-authorship Networks in Web of Science (1994-2020(

Background: The performance and collaboration of universities can be measured through scientific publications and scientometrics indicators. The purpose of this article is to describe the scientific publications situation of Kharazmi University and to discover the important actors of the Co-authorship networks of this university at three levels of researchers, organizations and countries in the...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • CoRR

دوره abs/1106.0114  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2011